9/11 World Trade Center Dustification Evidence
Falling steel sections trailing dust and evaporating.
The first lesson is from the 1960s. The left picture is a steel section hanging from a crane. It is a building block of the outer walls of the towers. These units were prefabricated from three steel beams and three flat steel cross pannels called spandrals. Then the units were used as building blocks to erect the perimeter walls 1,300 feet high. The three spandrals hold truss seat flanges to support the concrete floors.
The right picture shows the units in place.
This black and white picture is for scale. Each prefabricated unit is three stories high.
In the two pictures above, where is the dust coming from? What is the source of this huge volume of dust?
In the two pictures are large substructures of prefabricated units. The steel in the substructures is the source of the dust. Where else could it come from? Many of these steel substructures will never hit the ground. They vaporize (dustify) in only a few seconds. The many small straight pieces are aluminum cladidng that do float to the ground.
Below, we will see dustification in motion.
The video on the right is HD and slow motion. The object to watch is circled in the picture on the left. Play the video and watch the steel dustify before your eyes.
The beams in the core columns are much bigger than those in the outer walls. But they also dustify.
In the picture bellow, the arrow points to the core of the tower. The perimiter walls have already gone. A spire of braced core columns remains standing.
We cannot see the lower section of the spire but dust is streaming off of the hidden lower section also. The entire 700' spire will vaporize and disappear top to bottom. If not, would it not still be standing the next day?
The word “collapse” is used to describe the events of the destruction of the twin towers. The evidence is that the towers did not collapse. They turned to dust. They “dustified”. The debate centres around the basic ideas of collapse versus dustification.
Definition of “collapse”: In a controlled demolition a solid building is rapidly broken into small pieces which fall and form a pile of debris. This is called a collapse.
Definition of “dustification”: The bonds that hold together the molecules of solid steel are broken so that they become individual items that transform further into various particles thereby forming a dust cloud. The speed of the transformation is rapid at first but then slows. The heavy particles form dust clouds that fall while the lighter than air particles rise.
Chemistry tells us that H2O molecules have three states. These are solid, liquid and gas. We call them ice, water and steam. In the solid state the molecules are tightly bound together. In the liquid state the bond is less. In the gas state the bonds are broken altogether so that the H2O molecules exist individually. Being lighter than air, they form a cloud in the sky.
The mechanism that converts ice into water and then into steam is heat and is well known to the public.
The mechanism that dustifies steel is unknown to the public.
Some say the twin towers collapsed by the known mechanism of controlled demolition (involving thermitic (sic) reactions?).
Some say the towers turned to dust by the unknown mechanism of dustification.
There is a good piece of evidence to focus on that is acknowledged by both sides. In the destruction timeline the outer walls went first. Then the still standing core columns were exposed. A part of the core is seen standing apart and has been labeled a spire.
The question becomes what happened to the spire? Did it collapse or dustify?
The collapse spokesman says of the spire that it fell. This statement raises some questions. The above video evidence is that the braced steel beamed spire is seen to fall, according to the collapse spokesman, leaving behind a spire shaped cloud of formally-clinging dust. Then the remaining cloud is seen to rapidly fall vertically down into its footprint. The spire is not seen to fall sideways. Indeed, if it did fall sideways it would have been conspicuous in the debris field as it was some 700 feet tall.
Therefore it must have fallen vertically down. Was there a deep well at its base for the unit to descend into? If not then does not the collapse theory imply it must have broken top to bottom simultaneously into smaller pieces that then fell vertically down to become a pile of steel debris resting in its own footprint.
Or does the video imply that it simultaneously top to bottom turned into dust. Does the spire collapse or dustify?
The end of stage 1.